Compare and contrast the theories of Karl Marx (the class motive) and Essay

Compare and contrast the theories of Karl Marx (the class motive) and John Stuart loiter (the happiness motive) with reference to the issue of oppression in moder - Essay Examplehasized in both Marx, and Mill, precisely whereas Marx sees the political motives of the respective(prenominal) to be class-based rejection of capitalism, Mills sees the happiness of the one-on-one as more important than political or social oppression.Each of these theorists have contri simplyed towards twentieth century political influence, with both socialists and libertarians using these workings as cornerstones of activism and individual(a) beliefs. Marxs supporters tend to believe in community support, with individual needs loaded in favor of the society Mills theories are concerned with the right of pursuit of individual happiness, against the demands of a society for conformity and participation in accepted beliefs.Marxs theory of the individual was firmly influenced by the work of Hegel, who w as influential in turning the concentration of philosophers from institutions to the individual. Hegel saw society as the individual having subjective encounters With the Material World (Schleuning, webpage). While Hegel sees the hooey world as essential to developing the individual property and ownership are crucial. Ownership in this sense is not purchasing, but creation of material through work creative self-expression.Marx sees the individual worker being divided from his former ownership of the items which he makes, affecting his consciousness (Ritts, 153). The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the akin time over the means of mental production (Marx, page 191). This is the tyranny of the minority, or the little bourgeois class, over the much larger, working-class majority. Ritts sees this as Social Darwinism, with the fitness not suitability for survival, but personal fortune (Ritts, 153)The individual workers life inside an ind ustrial society is, harmonize to Marx, very precarious, and this is one of the causes of conflict between the individual and the bourgeois owners. Marxs